How Palestinian Authority politics work
Basem (Correction from comment below: Bassim) Khoury won a lot of admiration and respect when he reportedly resigned, at the beginning of October, in protest of the (later reversed) Palestinian decision to withdraw support from a resolution they (the Palestinians) had been drafting in the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva in support of the Goldstone report on last winter’s Gaza war. At that time, the Palestinian leadership agreed to another resolution, which was adopted, postponing consideration of the Goldstone report until March 2010.
Then, Bassim Khoury (a successful businessman who heads a Ramallah-based pharmaceutical company, and a good-looking nice guy who regularly brings flowers to his wife) refused to confirm these reports when contacted by various media.
A Facebook group was established in his honor, and probably still exists. (Full disclosure: I joined, at first — then resigned after some consideration about his interview with Le Monde, and the lack of clarity about his activities …)
Then, the next thing you know, he’s in Geneva — with what mandate? sent by whom? — to look into what had happened at the UN Human Rights Council, and to see what could be done. He has unpleasant little encounters with the media (Al-Jazeera, and Le Monde, if memory serves) in which he accuses journalists of misunderstanding, or misrepresenting various things. Khoury (who happens to be a Palestinian Christian) tells Le Monde that the donors are (indirectly) supporting Hamas in Gaza (!)
What is going on?
We reported then that an official in the Palestinian Ministry of Information said, in response to our question, that yes, Bassim Khoury had sent an SMS to Palestinian Prime Minister saying he preferred to resign after the initial Goldstone Fiasco.
(UPDATE: See comment from Bassim Khoury below on this …) However, he was then persuaded (or persuaded himself) that because Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had established a Palestinian investigative committee, he could withdraw his resignation. When he was in Europe (Geneva and Paris, see above), he was contacted by the Deputy Minister for Information, asking for clarification, and [according to the an official in the Palestinian Ministry of Information] he faxed a letter (to my knowledge, this has not been published) confirming that he had withdrawn his resignation.
But this, of course, does not improve the public impression of the Palestinian Authority, or the Palestinian leadership — especially since Khoury refused to explain his actions to the media, but only attacked and criticized the media for misunderstanding this or that.
Back in Ramallah, about a week ago, an SMS announced that Prime Minister Fayyad had accepted Khoury’s resignation.
Today, the Palestinian media is reporting that Hasan Abu Libdeh has been reported PA Minister of the Economy, to replace Khoury.
Abu Libdeh was the chief organizer of the Palestine Investment Conference in Bethlehem 2008. At the time, he reacted badly to a question from this journalist at the opening press conference about who funded the Investment Conference — was it only the donors (a grant had been taken from pledges given by donors at a Paris meeting in December 2007 that was called to support the Annapolis process)? Or was funding coming, separately, from Palestinian or PA sources? He answered that some of the money was from the donors, while the rest came from the PA. But, he was resolutely hostile after that.
In Bethlehem this past August, Abu Libdeh was present (discreetely, at the sidelines) at the fascinating and extremely important Fatah Sixth General Conference — and he was seen alone, in his shirt-sleeves, working on his laptop in the lobby of the beautiful Jacir Palace International Hotel (the five-star place where Tony Blair once stayed, and which was the headquarters of the most important delegations during the Palestine Investment Conference, as it was then again during the Fatah Conference) … Abu Libdeh is apparently a member of Fateh, and he was also apparently working as chef de cabinet for Prime Minister Salam Fayyad (who is not Fatah, and who was only present at the Fatah conference in Bethlehem at the opening session, though some Fatah delegates complained that there was too much Fayyad influence anyway, that one of the big posters in the main meeting hall showed a saying they recognized as Fayyads’s [saying something about looking to the future, and there were rumors that President Abbas intended to declare both Fayyad, an independent, and Yasser Abed Rabbo, an independent now but formerly DFLP spokesperson in Beirut who is now the Secretary of the PLO Executive Committee, long-time secret members of Fatah...]
ADDITIONAL NOTE: Prime Minister Salam Fayyad has apparently assumed himself the portfolio of Minister for Jerusalem Affairs, in the wake of the reported but still somewhat mysterious resignation from the post of Hatem Abdel Qader [Eid], following a brief term in office, and reportedly because of the lack of PA support (budgetary, as well as political) for Palestinian residents of Jerusalem who were evicted or who are facing eviction from their homes. Abdel Qader served (apparently happily) for over a year as Fayyad’s advisor on Jerusalem affairs, before he was sworn in as Minister this past spring by President Abbas.
UPDATE: In a recent press conference organized for members of the Foreign Press Association in Ramallah, Fayyad said that his government was not just a technical one, but is also a factional one, in the sense that it includes members of the various Palestinian political parties (though of course, not Hamas) …
Filed under: Donors, Gaza, Humanitarian Aid, Journalism and Journalists, Palestine & Palestinians
Abbas to Obama:” I’ll quit, there’s no chance for peace with Netanyahu ”
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1123705.html
What you wrote on me was just forwarded to me by a friend. You definitely have your facts wrong in various parts of this article. I never withdrew the resignation and there were no faxes made. In my letter to Dr. Fayyad thanking him for accepting my resignation I made it all very clear. I wish you will research your stories better in the interest of accuracy.
Bassim, thanks for your comment — it is interesting to know that you never withdrew the resignation and there were no faxes. This contradicts the information I was given by an official in the PA Ministry of Information, as I wrote. So, I will now contact you to see if you will be willing to explain in full what really happened,,,
Well, Basem [Bassim] Khoury never did contact me to offer his correct version, but here is an account posted by The Jerusalem Fund on 3 November 2009:
“…’this morning I was in congress and I spoke to one congressman about an upcoming resolution to be taken by the U.S. congress condemning the Goldstone report.
[Richard] Goldstone, for those of you who don’t know, is a famous, Jewish Zionist judge from South Africa who did reports on human rights abuses, on war crimes in various parts of the world; in ex-Yugoslavia, in Africa–Rwanda, Darfur and elsewhere. Goldstone was asked in January by the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva to go and investigate. The funny part is that congress wants to condemn the investigation–that he shouldn’t have investigated. You know, to me, who is worried about an investigation? Only a guilty [party] is worried about an investigation. So Goldstone started to embark on his work. Israel was very clear and said that they will not cooperate with him. Of course, there are voices in Israel today that are saying we made a mistake. The report of Goldstone was very balanced. It spread the blame and it said clearly that both sides committed what he thinks are war crimes even though Israel acted in self-defense. But its actions in self-defense still crossed red lines and constituted war crimes. And Goldstone basically recommends and asks the different parties to form independent commissions to investigate what happened. Failure to have these investigations will definitely open the door wide open to all sorts of litigation against the different parties. What is really amazing is that congress is now thinking of passing a resolution that condemns the report, that condemns the language of the report, but more importantly, condemns the language of the resolution adopted in Geneva two weeks ago. Reviewing the language of the resolution, it is identical to the same resolution language that passed when it was on Darfur, when it was on Rwanda and when it was on Serbia. How the language is deplorable when it comes to Palestine-Israel and the language is okay of a resolution when it comes to other places of the world is really beyond me. Secondly, if Israel is so sure it did nothing wrong, why not allow an open investigation; a credible one that is independent, that would come and either say, no you committed war crimes and the guilty should be punished or it will come and clear Israel of those charges. But to come and say that we condemn the report and we are not willing to be part of that report is not something that I think is right. It’s not right for Israel. It’s not right for Palestinians. It definitely is not right for the U.S. and for the Obama administration which claims to have opened a new page in relations with the Arab and Muslim worlds.
As you know, I resigned my post over the handling of the Goldstone [report]. I did it in silence. I never wanted this to be an issue that will be used against the PA. After all, I’m proud of the fact that I am part of that establishment. I’m not on their payroll but I am a Palestinian who is proud of our legitimacy, who is proud of our elections. And, as a result, we have an elected leader. So you have to stand with him. Right after that, I went to Geneva. I got a legal opinion on how we should tackle Goldstone. And I’m very proud of the fact that I advocated that. And at that exact moment, two o’clock in the afternoon when Hassan Abu Libdeh was sent by the prime minister to hand me the letter accepting my resignation, was the exact same moment we were discussing the Goldstone report again. By the way, it passed with more votes than we thought we will have the first time. I’m happy this is done. I believe the Goldstone report is a way that should set a foundation of future relations between us and the Israelis. Israel always thought they could do whatever they want and they will have impunity. For the first time ever, there was a situation whereby somebody came–a Jew, a Zionist, a credible person–came by and told them what you did was wrong. And I am sure, hopefully we will never have a next conflict, but I am sure the next time we have a conflict in the area, Israeli generals will think more than twice before giving orders to commit war crimes’…
Mr. Bassem Khoury is the outgoing Minister of National Economy (MoNE) for the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah.
This transcript may be used without permission but with proper attribution to The Palestine Center. The speaker’s views do not necessarily reflect the views of The Jerusalem Fund”.
This can be read in full here:
http://www.thejerusalemfund.org/ht/d/ContentDetails/i/7697