Now, the Nobel Economics Prize goes to NY Times columnist

Journalists normally are honored by something like a Pulitzer Prize, but today the Nobel Economics Prize went to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.

A headline in the Israeli press pointed plausibly to one possible explanation, stating pointedly that: “Bush critic wins nobel economics prize”.

The Associated press reported from Stockholm that “Krugman has been a harsh critic of the Bush administration and the Republican Party in The New York Times, where he writes a regular column and has a blog called ‘Conscience of a Liberal’. He has come out forcefully against John McCain during the economic meltdown, saying the Republican candidate is ‘more frightening now than he was a few weeks ago’ and earlier that the GOP has become ‘the party of stupid’.”

Economics prize committee member Tore Ellingsen said that “Krugman is not only a scientist but also an opinion maker”

The AP reported that Krugman told a news conference in Stockholm by telephone from the United States that some of his research was linked to currency crises and related issues. Commenting on the current global economic meltdown, Krugman said: ” ‘This is terrifying’, comparing it to the financial crisis that gripped Asia in the 1990s. ‘I had never thought that in my lifetime I would see anything that resembles the Great Depression, but this in fact does’ ”

AP said that “In contrast to his treatment of U.S. financial officials, Krugman has praised leaders in Britain for their response to the global financial crisis. In an Oct. 13 column in the New York Times, Krugman wrote that British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Chancellor Alistair Darling ‘defined the character of the worldwide rescue effort, with other wealthy nations playing catch-up’. Whereas U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson rejected a ‘sort of temporary part-nationalization’ involving governments giving financial institutions more money in return for a share of ownership, the British government ‘went straight to the heart of the problem … with stunning speed’. Krugman said the major European economies have ‘in effect declared themselves ready to follow Britain’s lead, injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into banks while guaranteeing their debts … And whaddya know’, Krugman continued, ‘Mr. Paulson — after arguably wasting several precious weeks — has also reversed course, and now plans to buy equity stakes rather than bad mortgage securities’.”

The Nobel committee indicated that the prize was awarded to Krugman this year not for his NYTimes columns but rather for his analysis of how economies of scale can affect trade patterns and the location of economic activity, according to the AP report. “The Nobel citation said Krugman’s approach is based on the premise that many goods and services can be produced at less cost in long series, a concept known as economies of scale. His research showed the effects of that on trade patterns and on the location of economic activity … Krugman introduced his theory in 1979 in a 10-page article in the Journal of International Economics. It posited that because consumers want a diversity of products, and because economies of scale make production cheaper, multiple countries can build a product such as cars. A nation like Sweden can build its own car brands for both export and sale at home, while also importing cars from other countries. The article also outlined a new theory of economic geography. Krugman’s idea was that if two countries were exactly alike, except one had a larger population, real wages would be somewhat higher in the more populous country because companies there could make better use of economies of scale, creating a greater diversity of goods, lower prices, or both. Because this enhances the welfare of consumers in that country, its population would increase as more people moved there, which would lead to additional increases in real wages”.

The AP also said that economics prize committee member Tore Ellingsen added that “Krugman’s analyses tend to back free trade and his research gives no ‘support for protectionism’.”

The AP report can be read in full here

East Timor leader Ramos-Horta tells UN to stop investigation into 1999 killings

Reports today in the Australian press state that “East Timor president Jose Ramos-Horta has said he wants the United Nations to drop its investigation into bloodshed surrounding a 1999 independence vote from Indonesia. Leaders in East Timor and Indonesia said in July that the issue was closed after expressing regret at the findings of a joint truth commission that blamed Indonesian security and civilian forces for ‘gross human rights violations. But the United Nations, which boycotted the truth commission, has said it will continue to back prosecutions through the Serious Crime Unit” … President Ramos-Horta, however, said that “As chief of state, I don’t authorize or allow the UN investigation into the 1999 crimes. Our position is keeping good ties with Indonesia”…
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/10/13/2389997.htm

Another Jewish holiday (Succot), another general closure

How to explain how exhausting this all is ??? Now, a ten-day general closure that will make life here very difficult indeed …

This is no way to treat other human beings.

This email came around this evening, just an hour or two before this new general closure was to start:

“General Closure of Judea and Samaria Region [i.e., the West Bank] during the Holiday of Tabernacles. In accordance with Ministry of Defense directives and in light of security assessments, a general closure of Judea and Samaria will commence today, October 12th, 2008 at midnight. The lifting of the closure will be carried out on Tuesday, October 21st, 2008 at midnight, in accordance with security assessments. For the duration of the closure, the passage of those in need of humanitarian and medical aid, as well as other specific requests will be authorized by the District Coordination and Liaison offices. The IDF regards the festival of Tabernacles as a highly sensitive time. Accordingly, the IDF will be on higher alert in order to ensure the safety of the citizens of Israel, while preserving, to the best of its ability, the daily routine of the Palestinian population”.

Sorry — this doesn't make sense: Ahtisaari wins what???? The Nobel Peace Prize?

What’s wrong with the Nobel Peace Prize Committee? They couldn’t find anybody better than long-time UN official Martti Ahtisaari to name as this year’s winner. Sorry, this just doesn’t cut it. This is the person who has most contributed to peace in the last year? Or even, let’s say, in recent years? Sorry, at best it could be said that Ahtisaari is a deal-maker. And the deals have to please the powers-that-be. He is a high-level functionary, looking out above all, and always, for his own career trajectory. And he just looks the other way whenever something is inconvenient — including the “human weaknesses” of his own staff. More recently this has come to be known as something else

And it is impossible to imagine him putting himself on the line for anything _ is this what we expect from Nobel Peace Prize winners?

Rather than rant, I will simply pick up a few excerpts from the NYTimes report on this Nobel Peace Prize announcement:

“In a book published by the Brookings Institution, Mr. [Gareth] Evans [former Australian Prime Minister and head of the International Crisis Group, which is a home for out-of-work but still ambitious policy makers who spend quite a lot of time rubbing each other’s backs] wrote that Mr. Ahtisaari ‘combines, to great effect, immense personal charm with a tough, no-nonsense, tell-it-like-it-is approach to conducting negotiations’. The book quotes one of the negotiators in the Aceh conflict as saying: ‘His method was really extraordinary. He said, “Do you want to win, or do you want peace?£” ‘ Former Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright said in an interview that she could not ‘think of a prize that is more richly deserved’. Mr. Ahtisaari’s role in Kosovo, she said, far exceeded his appointment in 2005 to represent the United Nations in ‘final status’ talks to determine the future of what was then a Serbian province. She said he was also deeply involved in the region during the 1996-99 Kosovo War.’He was part of a whole set of diplomatic maneuvers we had during the war itself, in terms of trying to sort out how to deal with the Russians and a host of issues to do with carrying out the actual ending of the war’, she recalled … Ms. Albright said Mr. Ahtisaari had been instrumental in creating ‘a glide path’ toward a final resolution that underpins Kosovo’s independence. ‘When I talked to him just last week, he thought things were moving in the right direction’, she said. ‘He has done a remarkable job’ … Mr. Ahtisaari[‘s] name was selected from a list of 197 nominees … In an interview on Friday that was published on the Nobel Foundation’s Web site, Mr. Ahtisaari said that the international community should not allow conflicts ‘to become frozen’ or intractable. ‘Every conflict can be solved’, he said…”
Yep.
The NYTimes article can be read in full here

Another Jewish holiday (Yom Kippur), another general closure

The IDF announcement came in an email 14 hours after the closure had already gone into effect: “In accordance with Ministry of Defense directives and in light of security assessments, a general closure of Judea and Samaria commenced yesterday, October 7th, 2008 at midnight. The lifting of the closure will be carried out on Friday, October 10th, 2008 at 8:00, in accordance with security assessments. For the duration of the closure, the passage of those in need of humanitarian and medical aid, as well as other specific requests will be authorized by the District Coordination and Liaison offices. The IDF regards Yom Kippur as a highly sensitive time. Accordingly, the IDF will increase its alertness in order to ensure the safety of the citizens of Israel , while preserving, to the best of its ability, the daily life of the Palestinian population”.

The Ramallah-based Palestinian Monitoring Group, part of the Negotiations Support Unit of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) reported that “Beginning at 24:00 on 07 October 2008, the Israeli army has continued to impose a complete closure over the West Bank districts on the occasion of the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. The Israeli army has also prevented civilians, including workers, from accessing the city of Jerusalem and areas inside the Green Line, only allowing previously coordinated humanitarian cases. The closure was lifted on the dawn of 10 October 2008. Beginning on 08 October 2008, the Israeli army has continued to intensify its restrictions at checkpoints located at the entrances to the city of Jerusalem as well as to the Al Aqsa Mosque compound in the old city of Jerusalem. Due to the closure imposed on the West Bank districts on the occasion of the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur, the Israeli army has also prevented civilians not holding Jerusalem-issued ID cards from entering the city. As a result, classes were disrupted at schools in the city of Jerusalem”.

Israeli commentator Nachman Shai — the IDF spokesperson during the scud missile attacks on Israel during the First Gulf War — wrote an editorial in Yisrael Hayom “questioning the ‘routine’ closure that was imposed on the Palestinian areas of Judea and Samaria over the Rosh Hashanah holiday and says that, ‘Every day of joy for the Jews thus becomes a day of mourning, or – in the best case – a day of disruption on the Palestinian side’. The editors believe that Israelis and Palestinians are fated to be neighbors for a long time, so ‘Unless we see fit to build a foundation of understanding and even shared values, between us and the Palestinians, this area will always be a ticking bomb, and will explode’.”