On the Quartet Message urging Palestinian respect for law and order

Here is an article from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz published today, that describes some of the “law and order” that SG BAN has called on Palestinians to respect —
“By the book”, by Gideon Levy:

“There’s no question about it – everything was done by the book. The gate was locked at 7 P.M. and 16,000 people, residents of the villages of Beit Furik and Beit Dajan, were imprisoned behind it until 6 A.M. That’s the procedure.

A woman who wants to cross the checkpoint at night has to go on foot, to wait until a female soldier comes to do a body check, even if she is about to give birth; that, too, is procedure.

And only cars with permits are allowed to enter Nablus, even if dying people are sitting inside them; that is also according to procedure. No soldier deviated from the procedure, everything was done by the book, the book of the occupation.

That is how it happened that a cancer patient was delayed for about an hour and a half at the Hawara checkpoint, until he died in a taxi that was not allowed to enter Nablus, a taxi in which he was trying to get from the hospital to his home, his final request. That is also what happened when the young woman in labor was forced to stand in the cold and the rain for about half an hour and to make her way on foot for several hundred meters while in labor. That’s the procedure.

The death of cancer patient Taysir Kaisi was inevitable, but why in such pain, waiting endlessly in a “non-permitted” taxi at the checkpoint? And the young woman from Beit Furik who was about to give birth, Roba Hanani, finally arrived at the hospital in Nablus and successfully gave birth there to her first child, but why with such torture? Why did they deserve it? What would we think if our loved ones were to die or suffer labor pains at a checkpoint separating the city and the village?

Life and death are in the hands of the checkpoint: The story of the death of Taysir Kaisi and the birth of Raghad Hanani, between the Hawara checkpoint and the Beit Furik checkpoint, during an easing of restrictions at the checkpoints, less than an hour’s drive from Tel Aviv, is a story that should disturb our equanimity.

Taysir Kaisi worked in Hazem Samara’s hummus shop in Nablus. He was 45 years old, with seven children, a hummus maker, with two bedrooms and a living room in a house in the Ain Bet Ilma refugee camp in the city. He fell ill a year ago; he was diagnosed with metastasizing liver cancer only a month ago. Dr. Hurani prescribed chemotherapy, which he received at the Al Watani hospital in the city.

His situation deteriorated, his pains increased, Kaisi wanted a second opinion. Someone recommended the Hadassah Hospital, but in the end he only managed to go to the Al Mutla [Al-Mutallaa] hospital in East Jerusalem. On Monday, January 15, he went to Jerusalem accompanied by his cousin Hussein Kaisi. They had four permits, that is the only way one can travel to receive a second opinion, a permit for two days, one for each day, for two people, one for “the purpose of medical needs” and the other “for the purpose of accompanying a patient,” all properly stamped, all after they showed the doctor’s appointment from the hospital in Jerusalem, and that is also according to the rules.

Kaisi was still in reasonable shape when he left his house on Monday, and he did part of the long trip to Jerusalem walking from one taxi to another, between the checkpoints. At the Qalandiyah checkpoint, they asked him to pull down his pants – security – and he managed that too.

At Al Mutla they decided to hospitalize the patient for four days. He and his cousin had permits for only two days. After several examinations the doctors recommended that Kaisi return home and continue to receive chemotherapy in Nablus, near his family and his children. On Thursday morning Taysir and Hussein left the hospital on their way home. That was Taysir’s final journey.

We are now sitting with the cousin Hussein on a rock overlooking the improvised taxi stand at the Hawara checkpoint, exactly where he left Taysir to die in a taxi that was not permitted to cross. The taxi drivers that the two stopped when they left the hospital in East Jerusalem refused to take them, because their permits for medical purposes and for the purpose of accompanying a patient were no longer valid, because of the hospitalization that had lasted two days beyond the permits. That is why the two, the patient and his cousin, traveled by bus to the Qalandiyah checkpoint, after waiting a long time at the bus stop. They crossed the checkpoint on foot, Taysir was still able to walk, and there they took a taxi from Ramallah to bring them to Nablus. Taysir screamed with pain during the entire trip, asking his cousin, “When will we get to Nablus already?’

When they reached the Hawara checkpoint, the checkpoint at the entrance to Nablus, Hussein asked the driver to enter the checkpoint and drive them home. The soldier at the checkpoint asked for permits. Hussein, who speaks Hebrew, explained to him that Taysir was a critically ill man who was returning to his home. The soldier asked for a permit from the taxi driver, but the taxi driver from Ramallah did not have a permit to enter Nablus. “Go back,” ordered the soldier. Hussein tried to explain to the soldier that Taysir was incapable of going on foot, and that all he wanted was to get home, but the soldiers insisted. Those are the procedures. They said that Hussein and Taysir could enter Nablus, but only on foot.

Taysir was no longer in any condition to walk even one step. The pains in his stomach had increased during the course of the uncomfortable trip and he was no longer capable of standing on his feet. ‘This is a cancer patient,’ Hussein tried to explain, to no avail. The soldiers, he says, did not pay attention. For lack of any other choice, they turned back, doing the soldier’s bidding.

The driver parked his taxi at the improvised taxi stand at the front of the checkpoint, Taysir groaned with pain and Hussein asked him to set out with him on foot. Taysir was incapable of doing so. So Hussein went out to look for a taxi with a permit to enter Nablus, leaving his cousin in the taxi. ‘Take care of my wife and the children,’ Taysir asked Hussein, apparently his last words.

The desperate Hussein tried to find a driver who would agree to take them through the checkpoint. In an UNRWA vehicle that just passed there was no room, no other car came.

One of the taxi drivers suggested that he call the ambulance in Nablus. Only in an ambulance will you be able to cross, the driver advised him. Hussein called the Red Crescent in Nablus, another 15 minutes passed until the ambulance arrived at the checkpoint. The ambulance driver didn’t find the two, Hussein ran to him and directed him to the taxi where Taysir was dying.

The paramedic got out of the ambulance and approached Taysir, asking him how he was, but Taysir didn’t reply. He was sitting in the back seat of the taxi. The driver of another taxi that was standing at the taxi stand, Jihad Hareb, says that he saw Taysir sitting in the taxi for about an hour and a half, his yellow skin slowly turning black, ‘as though someone had choked him.’ The paramedic checked his pulse and respiration and determined that Taysir was dead. Hussein also says that about an hour and a half passed from the moment they arrived at the checkpoint until the ambulance arrived. With the help of two taxi drivers, they removed Taysir from the taxi and carried him to the ambulance, and drove to the hospital in Nablus, where his death was determined. The doctors estimated that Taysir had died about 45 minutes before arriving at the hospital.

Hussein called Taysir’s wife, Nawal, and informed her: ‘Taysir died at the checkpoint, on the way home.’ He says that it was hard for him to give the news over the phone, Taysir had so much wanted to get home. A B’Tselem investigator, Salma al-Debai, also took testimony from Hussein, in order to prepare a report about the incident on behalf of her organization.

The IDF Spokesman’s Office, for its part, responds with a total denial: ‘An investigation regarding a claim that a Palestinian cancer patient was delayed at the Hawara checkpoint found the claim to be incorrect. An investigation carried out by the Civil Administration’s coordinator of health showed that the Palestinian died on the way, during a taxi ride from the hospital in Jerusalem to the Hawara checkpoint.’

Some people die at the checkpoint and some are born there: Wrapped in a woolen blanket, an electric heater warming her well-appointed room, lies the infant Raghad Hanani, 25 days old, in her bed. When she grows up, maybe her parents, Roba and Derar – he a Palestinian policeman and she a 25-year-old housewife – will tell her about her mother’s travails when she was about to give birth.

It was Roba’s first pregnancy. On Friday, December 7, she went into labor. An act of the devil – evening had already fallen on their village, Beit Furik, east of Nablus; an act of the devil – the IDF had locked the iron gate. The coordinator of ground operations of Rabbis for Human Rights, Zacharia Sadeh, says that for months this gate has been locked every night, from 7 P.M. to 6 A.M., imprisoning behind it the 16,000 residents of the two neighboring villages, Beit Furik and Beit Dajan.

It was 8:30 P.M., about an hour and a half after the gate had been locked; the couple ordered a taxi and drove toward the iron gate intending to reach the hospital in Nablus, a few minutes’ drive away. There are two roads to Nablus; one is short and is open to Jews only, and one is longer and passes through the Beit Furik checkpoint. Access to both roads passes first of all through the iron gate, and it was locked, as we have said.

The taxi driver, Mahmoud Melitat, approached the iron gate and began to flash his car lights in the direction of the IDF guard tower, which is located a few hundred meters from the gate. Derar says that it was cold and rainy outside. After about 10 minutes, a Hummer arrived. The driver, Melitat, tried to explain to the soldiers that there was a woman in labor in his taxi, but the soldiers insisted that she had to get out and cross the gate on foot.

The couple got out of the taxi, Roba was crying, holding her stomach, scared about her first birth, leaning on her husband’s shoulders. They walked from the gate in the direction of the checkpoint, a distance of several hundred meters, and there the soldiers ordered them to wait until a female soldier came to do a body check on Roba – maybe she was carrying a bomb on her way to Nablus. On the other side of the checkpoint a Palestinian ambulance that had been ordered by Derar was waiting, and the soldiers did not let its driver pass to the other side of the checkpoint, which is closed at night. Derar says that the soldiers did not even allow Roba to get into the ambulance and to wait inside. They said that these were the orders.

So they stood outside until the female soldier arrived, Roba was examined and the permit to go to the hospital was finally given. The IDF Spokesman responded that he was not familiar with this case.

In the end, Raghad was born in the hospital in Nablus. Mother and baby are doing well. Grandma and grandpa, Roba’s parents, have seen their granddaughter only once so far, in the hospital. The residents of their village of Salem, which can be seen on the opposite hill, are not allowed to enter Beit Furik.

And nevertheless the Hananis were lucky: Late in 2003 Rula Ashateya, who was also in labor, tried to cross that same accursed checkpoint. The soldiers prevented her from crossing at the time, and Rula crouched to give birth on the ground, hiding behind one of the cement blocks of the checkpoint, with her husband serving as midwife. The newborn apparently hit the rock and died. Her parents had intended to call her Mira, I wrote here at the time, since all their children’s names begin with M. Then, too, the IDF Spokesman said that ‘the soldiers are instructed to allow crossing at the checkpoint in humanitarian cases, at any time and in any situation’.”
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/820922.html

Quartet Meets in Washington

“The Quartet expressed its deep concern at the violence among Palestinians and called for respect for law and order,” U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said, reading a statement on behalf of the quartet, according to a report from the Reuters news agency.

Law and order! Did the other three members of the Quartet (which is composed of the U.S., European Union, Russia and the UN) ask UN SG to read this statement, because they were unwilling to put themselves in such a position, reading a patently ridiculous remark?

Law and order! There hasn’t been anything like “law and order” in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt, the official UN terminology) for years, if not decades.
The Palestinians are living under Israeli military occupation.

Technically, the West Bank is divided into many different areas (A, B, and C don’t even begin to explain the complexity), in all of which the ultimate authority is a combination of Israeli miltary orders and British emergency regulations left over from the period of the British Mandate of Palestine that ended with a unilateral British pull-out on 15 March 1948.

The Gaza Strip was ruled by Egyptian military law from 1948 until 1967 (with a brief interruption in 1956), then by an Israeli military administration, then by … oh, it’s almost too complicated to explain. The unilateral Israeli Disengagement from Gaza in September 2005, however, did not end the Israeli occupation of Gaza to anyone’s satisfaction — and under international law, Israel is still the occupier.

But, law and order! There is nothing of the sort — anywhere in the oPt. My friend Adnan told me, several years ago, that he told his wife that if anyone hits their car while she is driving in Jerusalem, she should just say thank you, and come home. There is no law and order, and no legal recourse, for any Palestinian anywhere in the oPt.

How could UN SG Ban have been persuaded to read such an embarassing statement — that none of the other Quartet members would ever be willing to read?

On Thursday, the UN spokesperson told journalists at UNHQ/NY that: “The Secretary-General is looking forward to his first Quartet meeting. He hopes that the Quartet will seriously engage with the key issues that have a direct impact on the situation on the ground, going beyond mere statements.”

Reuters also reported, after the meeting, that: “At least 23 Palestinians have been killed and more than 200 wounded in the last 24 hours of internal fighting, making some analysts deeply skeptical of broader U.S.-led peace efforts.”

By Saturday, the fighting was so bad that “the U.N. said it would not reopen its schools in Gaza on Saturday after a midyear recess, as scheduled, because of the fighting — a decision that kept nearly 200,000 students at home,” the Associated Press reported.

Reuters also reported that ‘It needs to stop,’ [U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza] Rice said of the violence but argued it should not delay work toward a broader peace deal that could someday lead to a Palestinian state. Rice plans to meet Olmert and Abbas soon to sketch out how they might work on peace.”

Associated Press quoted U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice as saying, somewhat incongruously, after the Quartet meeting that “There’s simply no reason to avoid the subject of how we get to a Palestinian state.”

The Quartet members also apparently “reaffirmed a year-old international aid embargo against the Hamas-led government unless it renounces violence, recognizes Israel and respects past peace deals. But it said a temporary mechanism set up by the Europeans last year to get aid to the Palestinians while bypassing Hamas should be ‘further developed.’ The United States does not contribute to this fund. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov voiced his country’s strong skepticism over the boycott [and isolation] and said it was necessary to work with Syria as well as Hamas, which the United States considers a terrorist organization…A senior Bush administration official later scoffed at Russia’s views both about talking to Syria and over the boycott, saying that Russia had only sent about $10 million to help the Palestinians over the past year anyway…Palestinian Foreign Minister and Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar urged the Quartet in a letter to engage in talks with the Palestinian government to try to end internal fighting. The United States is working to embolden [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas [of Fatah] in the face of opposition from Hamas and wants the quartet’s help on this, particularly in building up the Palestinian president’s security forces which Washington is helping train and equip.”

Meanwhile, an article by Benny Avni in The New York Sun is reporting that “A former top American diplomat, John Bolton, said a group known as ‘the Quartet’ should never have included the United Nations as a member. The Quartet has been a staple of Middle East diplomacy since its inception in 2002, after President Bush first articulated his vision of two independent states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace, a plan he dubbed the ‘road map.’ … Mr. Bolton, who resigned as American ambassador to the United Nations in December [said in an interview]: ‘I never thought the Quartet was a good idea,’ he told The New York Sun. ‘I don’t think the U.N. should have a role’ in negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs, he said. Unlike Russia, the European Union, and America, the United Nations is not a sovereign state and therefore carries no legal status in such a group, Mr. Bolton — an international lawyer by training — said.”

Sorry, but that makes no sense at all. The United Nations is the successor to the League of Nations, which approved the British Mandate of Palestine in 1923 (almost five years after British troops, under General Allenby, marched out of Egypt and then cut through the Ottoman lines to arrive triumphally in Jerusalem in December 1918. When Britain decided, unilaterally, that it couldn’t take it any more, it seized the newly-created United Nations with the Question of Palestine in 1947, and the United Nations decided (UN General Assembly Resolution 181 of 29 November 1948) to partition Palestine into two states (with economic union, and Jerusalem having a special international status) — one Jewish and one Arab. The British unilaterally pulled out of Palestine on 14 May 1948, and within hours the State of Israel was unilaterally proclaimed from Tel Aviv. The United Nations has a particular responsibility to Palestine, and to the Palestinians — notwithstanding what former Ambassador Bolton said.

The NY Sun story also reported that “Officials in Washington see the Quartet as ‘one instrument’ among many in advancing the road map, which remains the goal of American policy in the region, an American official who requested anonymity said yesterday. A spokesman for the State Department, Sean McCormack, described Friday’s meeting recently as a ‘vanilla’ Quartet gathering. [What does that mean?] For Israel, the Quartet was never much more than a formal arena in which secondary diplomatic players — including the United Nations — could ‘vent’ their opinions, one Israeli official, who requested anonymity because he wanted to speak candidly, said. The official said Israel sees Russia, the European Union, and the United Nations as biased, but that their inclusion in the Quartet prevents them from expressing hostile opinions or launching initiatives in other forums…Mr. Ban, who told the Sun in a December interview that he saw the Palestinian Arab dispute with Israel as the ‘core’ of the unrest in the Middle East, has started recently to talk more about Iraq, Iran, and Lebanon. The secretary-general will be joined in Washington by the U.N. Middle East envoy, Alvaro de Soto, as well as a British aide, Michael Williams. A former South Korean foreign minister, Mr. Ban is currently involved in a struggle to gain control over the U.N. bureaucracy, including the world body’s Middle East policies. Some Middle East advisers are touting the Quartet as a way for the United Nations to get involved in headline-grabbing diplomacy. Others say the Quartet is all but dead, and are promoting U.N. diplomacy that will be free of Washington’s influence.”
http://www.nysun.com/article/47903

Rice in London confirms sequence: Quartet meeting first, then US-Israeli-Palestinian summit to follow

The Associated Press is reporting from London, where U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice met this afternoon with British PM Tony Blair, that “Israel and the Palestinians can pick any agenda they want for a preliminary peacemaking summit with the United States, but it is too early to tackle the toughest issues…’We’re not yet at the point where I think we can determine what we would do about formal negotiations, when and if’ they can occur, Rice said at the close of a week’s trip to the Middle East and Europe. ‘It’s really a time to try to get the parties into more of a confidence-building phase and we’ll see what comes after that.’  Rice said her three-way meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas probably would take place in the Middle East in the first half of February.
Speaking to reporters traveling with her, Rice said that session will follow a gathering in Washington of the international sponsors of a dormant, step-by-step peace plan called the ‘road map’ that was to have led to Palestinian statehood by 2005.  She acknowledged that the 2003 plan’s requirements had become something of an obstacle in restarting talks between the two sides, but she said it remains the guideline.” 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070118/ap_on_re_mi_ea/rice

It does not seem that the U.S. understands, yet, the Palestinian problems with this sequence — despite Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ saying “loud and clear” that he doesn’t want any more temporary anything.

Quartet to convene in Washington DC on 2 February, Rice indicates

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice is reportedly indicating today that the Quartet (the U.S., European Union, Russian Federation, and the UN), which has UN Security Council endorsement to control international diplomatic efforts to make peace in the Middle East, will meet in Washington DC on 2 February. 

Rice said Wednesday the Quartet would meet in Washington next month.  Rice said on Thursday that the meeting would probably take place February 2.

Then, apparently, the US would host a formal summit between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas.

UN SG BAN told journalists at UNHQ/NY on Wednesday that he had “discussed this matter with President Bush. I emphasized the importance of re-energizing the Quartet meeting to facilitate the peace process in the Middle East. I have been discussing this matter with Secretary [of State Condoleezza] Rice, and it is my hope that we will be able to have a Quartet meeting as soon as possible, preferably early February. I think you must have read the press reports. We are working for a date. During my stay in Washington, I was contacted by the American administration about the possibility of a mutually convenient date. We are working on that…”

After a just-completed trip to the Middle East, during which U.S. Secretary of State Rice said she heard “loud and clear” Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’s call for deepter U.S. involvement in what only the most determined optimists call a peace process , Rice met yesterday in Berlin with the German Foreign Minister and today with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.  Germany is  President of the European Union for the next six months.    Rice is next flying to London to speak with British PM Tony Blair

AFP is reporting that Germany, as the current EU president, has made revitalizing the quartet one of its priorities. The Quartet held its last full meeting in September.  Merkel made the appeal this month in Washington to US Pres George W Bush.  ” ‘We have the impression that there is movement on the issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,’ Merkel said Thursday.  ‘We have a common political interest in finding a solution to this conflict and the European Union would like to make a contribution within the framework of the quartet. We know that resolving this conflict or at least making progress would also have an effect on all the other regional conflicts’ … Rice said late Wednesday that she hoped the international partners would help both sides to move forward on the stalled roadmap, the peace plan that the quartet drew up in 2003 with the aim of establishing a viable Palestinian state living peacefully alongside Israel.  ‘It has the backing of Israelis and Palestinians, but it also has the backing of the entire international system,’ Rice said. ‘I would expect that as we try to accelerate progress on the roadmap, the quartet would try and lend assistance to the parties as they try to do it’.” http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070118/ts_afp/usmideastgermanydiplomacyrice

The 1993 Oslo Peace process that resulted in official recognition between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, and the creation of the Palestinian [National] Authority, began shortly after the U.S.-led Desert Storm operation that expelled Iraqi forces from Kuwait in 1991.   The Oslo Accords never once mentioned the possibility of a Palestinian state — so by implication it was left until after the final status talks, which have never materialized.

President Bush’s “vision” of a Palestinian state emerged after a brutal Israeli re-invasion of the West Bank in 2002, that caused an international outcry.  The Saudi Peace plan offering full Arab recognition and normalized relations with the Jewish State of Israel emerged at the same time.  The Roadmap was adopted by the Quartet, and endorsed by the UN Security COuncil, after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.  The creation of a Palestinian State is left until the the end of the second stage of the Roadmap — but things never got to that point, either.  Palestinian President Abbas has been adamant in refusing any kind of temporary or provisional Palestinian State — an idea recently re-floated by Israeli officials, who apparently cannot yet make up their minds about what they do want, other than continuation of the status quo.

You can usually tell when peace is in the air when there is talk about potential economic benefits to at least one of the parties. 

Today’s Jerusalem Post, an English-language Israeli newspaper, carries a report saying that “Israel could generate $12 billion in annual trade with its Arab neighbors, including the Palestinian Authority and, through it, the Arab Free Trade Area, according to the Palestine Trade Center in Ramallah.  While Israel has worked hard to expand its trade options with the United States, Europe and China, it should not forget that one of its most lucrative partners is right next door, argued the center’s trade policy adviser, Saad Khatib.  In spite of the hostilities between the two groups, the second largest country to which Israel exported goods in 2005, excluding diamonds, was the Palestinian territories, Khatib told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday. He spoke to the Post following a Jerusalem event hosted by the Peres Center for Peace designed to publicize a report by the Palestine Trade Center on economic relations between Israel and Palestine…If relations between Israel and the Palestinians were to become ‘friendly’ rather then ‘hostile,’ the value of Israeli exports to the Palestinians could grow to $7b. annually within the next five to 10 years, Khatib said.  But that number could be augmented by another $5b. within that same time frame because Israel could export its products duty-free to the Arab Free Trade Area countries with the help of the Palestinians. That would includes duty-free sales of products to Yemen, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Tunis, Morocco, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Mauritania and Somalia.

“Yitzhak Gal, an economic adviser to the Israeli-Jordan Chamber of Commerce, said that Israeli companies were already looking to tap into the Arab Free Trade bloc through their relations with countries such as Jordan and Egypt.
But it would be simpler if these companies could enter the larger Arab market with the help of Palestinian businesses, Gal said. The rules for the Arab Free Trade bloc are not that restrictive, so all that would need to happen is for some part of the production process to occur within the Palestinian territories, and the products could be sold to the larger Arab market, said Gal.
That would be lucrative for Israel because the Gulf countries and Saudi Arabia, which are part of the bloc, were among the fastest growing markets in the world, Gal said…

“Given that it is cheaper to export goods to the Arab countries than to the United States, that opens small businesses up to larger affordable markets, said Khatib. That’s true too for moshavim that want to sell dairy products or other agricultural produce, Khatib said. He added that the Arab countries in turn are particularly interested in Israel’s technological products.  In addition, Khatib said, if one calculates the benefits of a joint tourism industry, economic ties between Israel and the Palestinians could generate $17b. annually within the next five to 10 years, Khatib said.” http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467756926&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
 

SG BAN tells press about talks in Washington DC

SG BAN returned to UNHQ/NY on Wednesday afternoon, and took questions from journalists about his trip to the capital of the UN’s largest financial contributor:

Question: Mr. Secretary-General, one of the things that had been reported that you asked for down there was an increase in US financial contributions for peacekeeping, more money for it. What specifically did you have in mind in terms of a target, and what response did you get to that request?
SG: The US Government is the largest financial contributor to the regular budget, as well as the peacekeeping operations budget. The US Congress has imposed a cap of 25 percent in peacekeeping operations, there is a shortage of two percentage points, which will result in annually a $150 million or $200 million shortage of American contributions, which will, if it is accumulated, create very difficult constraints in smoothly carrying out peacekeeping operations. I have raised this issue in my meetings with President Bush and all the Congressional leaders. I strongly appealed and requested that the US Congress lift this spending cap, this peacekeeping operations cap of 25 percent. They said they will discuss this matter.

Q: Mr. Secretary-General, one of the other issues you discussed with the President was Iraq. He apparently asked the UN for additional help in Iraq. I wonder if you could be specific and tell us what he asked for and what your response was.
SG: President Bush wanted to see an increased presence and role of the United Nations in Iraq. I told President Bush that, since the UN presence and operation in Iraq is actually constrained by the situation on the ground — I mean the security concerns — but we will try to continue to participate and increase our role in Iraq, including the International Compact with Iraq. The United Nations has been, and will continue, wherever and whenecer we can, to increase our presence there, but that will largely be constrained by security concerns.

Q: Did you raise the issue of Lebanon with President Bush? And also, what are your expectations for Paris-3, which is the donors conference which will take place on 25 January?
SG: With President Bush, I have discussed wide-ranging issues, including of course the situation in Lebanon, and I am going to participate in the international conference on Lebanon. I hope that, first of all, I will personally be able to meet with the Lebanese Government leaders, including Prime Minister [Fuad] Siniora, and I hope there will be many countries participating for the reconstruction and political and social stabilization of Lebanon.

Q: And just in terms of the Lebanon question, when you do meet Prime Minister Siniora in [Paris], there is concern that there may be little support, or not as much necessary support, coming out at this time on the international tribunal. Are you going to convey to him your commitment, as far as the Secretary-General, to the establishment of the international tribunal for those in the assassination of Prime Minister [Rafik] Hariri and others?
SG: It is important that the Security Council has decided to establish a special tribunal. The United Nations has concluded agreement with the Lebanese Government. It is a source of concern for me, as Secretary-General, that we are not being able to establish a special tribunal, as was mandated by the Security Council. At the same time, I was encouraged by the willingness of the Lebanese Government to work together for the establishment of a special tribunal, including President [Emile] Lahoud and Speaker of the Parliament [Nabih] Berri. I will discuss again this matter with the Lebanese leaders when I meet them in Paris.

Q: Sir, have you discussed the Quartet meeting with President Bush — any update on a new date for this meeting, sir?
SG: I discussed this matter with President Bush. I emphasized the importance of re-energizing the Quartet meeting to facilitate the peace process in the Middle East. I have been discussing this matter with Secretary [of State Condoleezza] Rice, and it is my hope that we will be able to have a Quartet meeting as soon as possible, preferably early February. I think you must have read the press reports. We are working for a date. During my stay in Washington, I was contacted by the American administration about the possibility of a mutually convenient date. We are working on that

Q: On 15 January, the resignation of 60 USGs and ASGs [Under-Secretaries-General and Assistant Secretaries-General] took effect. Is it time to move on a little faster, and were you asked by the President to move a little faster on your reorganization efforts?
SG: As you said, the deadline was over. And I am going to review all the senior management appointments. But I have to see, the contracts of most of the senior officials are due to expire at the end of February, so I will have to consider all this, taking this into mind…. My intention is to finish, if possible, all the appointments at one time…” http://www.un.org/apps/sg/offthecuff.asp?nid=968

Kofi Annan warns the UN Security Council that the Middle East is in “profound crisis”

SG Annan told the UN Security Council in New York today that “mistrust between Israelis and Palestinians is reaching new heights, that tensions in the region are near the breaking point… Extremism and populism are leaving less political space for moderates, including those States that have reached peace agreements with Israel… ”

Sounding for all the world like George W. Bush — can you find any difference? — the UNSG told the Security Council that “I believe in the right of Israel to exist, and to exist in full and permanent security – free from terrorism, free from attack, free even from the threat of attack… I believe in the right of the Palestinians to exercise their self-determination. They have been miserably abused and exploited… They deserve to see fulfilled their simple ambition to live in freedom and dignity.”

Skating on pretty thin ice, the SG told the Security Council that the Road Map (which was endorsed by the Council in resolution 1515) should still be the “reference point” for a new and urgent push for peace.  

But, the SG said, the Quartet (the U.S., European Union, Russia, and the UN – which sponsored the plan) should also be “open to new ideas and initiatives.”

The Quartet need “to find a way to institutionalize its consultations with the relevant regional partners.  It needs to engage the parties directly in its deliberations. The time has come for the Quartet to be clearer at the outset on the parameters of an end-game deal,” the UNSG told the UN Security Council.

SG Kofi Annan predicts lots of peace initiatives in the Middle East in coming days

“The situation…in Palestine and Israel is a particularly difficult one. It is something that we are all struggling with today. Lots of initiatives are being discussed now. You noticed that not long ago, the Prime Minister of Spain, the President of France and the Prime Minister of Italy, I think, came up with an initiative suggesting an international conference. There are other suggestions being made to try and find a way out of this. I myself, when I came back from the region last summer after the Lebanese war, indicated that what happened in Lebanon was a wake-up call and that we need to move very quickly as an international community to try and stabilize the situation in Lebanon and move on to resolve their relations with Israel, [and] look at the comprehensive peace in Lebanon, in Syria, and with Palestine. I think in the coming months or years, you’re going to see a very active action on this. No one is satisfied with the status quo, nor should be.” – remark made in a press conference in Geneva on 21 November.  http://www.un.org/apps/sg/offthecuff.asp?nid=952Â