Suspicions still remain, among those who are suspicious.
Reuters’ Mark Heinrich is reporting from Vienna that “diplomats” believe “the working document is flawed for apparently ruling out future inquiries by inspectors and making no mention of wider-ranging checks that the UN nuclear watchdog itself has said are needed to verify Tehran has no hidden bomb agenda. It also does not define what Iran must do to resolve open questions, and ignores a UN demand for Tehran to suspend uranium enrichment to regain trust in its nuclear aspirations. [However] Diplomats close to the International Atomic Energy Agency touted the ‘understandings’ with Iran as a milestone for laying out a timetable for transparency by December after four years of stalling by Tehran that prompted U.N. sanctions.
‘It’s a good work plan with phases and dates to resolve outstanding issues, as requested by the (IAEA’s 35-nation) board of governors. Board members should welcome this development,’ a senior agency official told Reuters. The August 21 pact, whose text was released on Monday, said Tehran had resolved the first issue relating to the nature of its nuclear work — secret, small-scale experiments with plutonium, the commonest ingredient in nuclear bombs.
Details of what Iran did to defuse concerns about the tests may emerge in a new IAEA report due on Wednesday, two weeks before a meeting of the agency’s 35-nation governing board.
The report will shed light on Iran’s level of cooperation and could influence pending talks among six world powers on possible harsher sanctions … Western diplomats, asking for anonymity due to political sensitivities, criticized the plan’s failure to get Iran to reinstate the IAEA’s Additional Protocol, which permits broader, short-notice inspections of sites not declared to be nuclear …
A clause in the working document saying that, once Iran had cleared up issues listed, there would be ‘no more remaining issues and ambiguities’ raised diplomatic eyebrows.
‘There is surprise that the IAEA seems to have forgone the right to ask more questions,’ said a diplomat from one of the EU states in the sextet of powers, Germany, France and Britain. Iran has insisted that it seeks only an alternative source of electricity, not explosives, from enriched uranium. ‘Iran has wised up, realising that stiffing the IAEA helped lead to unanimous U.N. sanctions resolutions. The work plan is designed to show cooperation in order to forestall more sanctions,’ said Mark Fitzpatrick, chief non-proliferation analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.’
But there is less here than meets the eye. (There are) serious omissions. Iran is holding on to the more political issues for leverage in any future negotiations with the Europeans and Security Council permanent members,’ he said. Critics also faulted the plan’s requirement that issues be addressed sequentially and require closure of each before going on to the next. This could drag out the process, especially if Iran blamed more sanctions action for foot-dragging, they said.
Western diplomats said the plan did not stipulate IAEA access to certain Iranian officials, facilities and documents crucial to verifying answers on thornier issues, including:
* particles of highly enriched — or weapons-grade — uranium found on technical university equipment
* research on an advanced centrifuge able to refine uranium 2-3 times faster than the old, unreliable model Iran uses now
* a black-market bomb-making manual in Iran’s possession
* intelligence about administrative links between uranium processing, high explosives tests and a missile warhead design.
The plan said the IAEA aimed to resolve the centrifuge matter by November, but set no deadlines for the others … ”