Cuba signs the two most basic human rights treaties

Apparently, Cuba announced on 10 December – International Human Rights Day — its intention to sign the two most basic human rights treaties.

The two treaties — the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights — are both derived from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, or UDHR (see UN-Truth here), adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948 at a meeting in Paris at the culmination of two years of intensive drafting work. The U.S. then-First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt and a French diplomat were the two prime movers in those negotiations.

As the website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights puts it,the UDHR, together with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [for full text see here], and its two Optional Protocols [see the first one here and the second one, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty here ], and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [for full text see here ], “form the so-called [sic] International Bill of Human Rights“.

Cuba’s Foreign Minister Felipe Perez Roque, looking very relaxed and confident in the photos that accompanied the news story, was at UNHQ/NY for the brief signing ceremony. At a news conference later, he said, according to the Associated Press, that “Cuba was signing the covenants now because the UN Human Rights Commission — which he claimed the U.S. used for ‘brutal pressure and blackmail’ against Cuba — had been ‘defeated’ in what he called ‘a historic victory for the Cuban people’.”

The AP reported that Perez Roque stated “that Cuba would later specify some reservations about treaty provisions”, and the AP noted that in 2001, Fidel Castro criticized the International Covenant on Economic and Social and Cultural Rights, saying it “could serve as a weapon and a pretext for imperialism to try to divide and fracture the workers, create artificial unions, and decrease their political and social power and influence.”

At the news conference, the AP reported, Cuban Foreign Minister was asked by journalists “whether Fidel’s opposition to parts of the two covenants, including the right to form independent trade unions, had changed now that Raul is president, Perez Roque said no. He reiterated that Cuba would later specify some reservations about treaty provisions … A statement Cuba submitted when it signed the two treaties said its constitution and laws ‘guarantee the effective realization and protection of these rights for all Cubans’, but also stressed that the government would register ‘reservations or interpretative declarations it considers relevant’… According to this Cuban statement submitted at the signing, the United States’ economic embargo [which has been in place 46 years] and hostility to Cuba’s communist government ‘constitutes the most serious obstacle to the enjoyment by the Cuban people of the rights protected by the covenants’.” This AP report is published here.

The UN regrets…

Diplomats, NGOs, the general public, and even UN officials are not admitted to UN press conferences. This is a long-standing rule, and the UN’s Department of Public Information always stations accreditation officers at the entrance of UN press conferences or UN briefings to make sure that only properly accredited journalists enter.

This is to ensure that a press conference remains a press conference, and not just a polite committee meeting, or a rally. It is also, most importantly, to ensure the absence of pressure and intimidation on journalists, who should be free to ask whatever question they want without fear of reprisal. It was very important to maintain this rule during the bad years of the Cold War, but it clearly still remains important today.

The latest inexplicable violation of this long-standing rule happened just very recently at a press conference at the UN Office in Geneva by the UN Human Rights Committee’s controversial and headline-getting Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Swiss academic Jean Ziegler. Cuban diplomats were present, in violation of the basic rule, and then asked about the identity of a journalist who apparently asked provocative questions — an important violation of the fundamental principle at stake.

While the matter is a very serious one for the freedom of the press, it would not have been paid too much attention were it not for the fact that anything to do with Jean Ziegler’ comes under close scrutiny.

Jean Ziegler has been controversial in Switzerland for being a Socialist — Switzerland is a country which was at the forefront of the anti-communist defense during the Cold War, and still has powerful right wing political parties.

He has also provoked strong reaction among supporters of Israel following his reports on problems of hunger and malnutrition in the occupied Palestinian territory. Ziegler, who is Jewish, told journalists at the time that he believed the reaction was due to the fact that he is a supporter of the Alternate Information Center in Jerusalem, run by Israelis who are critical of their government’s policies towards Palestinians.

It was UN Watch which brought this latest matter to the attention of the wider press and public, with an email distributed to its mailing list last night.

Continue reading The UN regrets…