Israeli human rights groups criticize new Palestinian "naturalization" criteria separating Gazans from West Bank

As Quartet Envoy Tony Blair and Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter careen around the region, showing up by design or purest coincidence together in Gaza today, the Israeli Defense Ministry’s Coordinator of [Israeli] Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) has suddenly authorized a significant increase in the number of trucks carrying humanitarian supplies to enter the Gaza Strip to some 144 yesterday and 177 today or so (last week it was about 100 fewer trucks than that per day).

Carter in Gaza - 16 June 2009Jimmy Carter visits the bombed-out shell of the former American International School in Gaza

Meanwhile, two Israeli human rights groups — GISHA and HAMOKED — have just gone public with their opposition to a new official procedure that restricts Palestinian civil and human rights.

Continue reading Israeli human rights groups criticize new Palestinian "naturalization" criteria separating Gazans from West Bank

UNRWA official dines with IDF's Amos Gilad while blockaded Gazans get … whatever Gilad allows: "Let them eat cake!"

A brilliant and sensational article in Thursday’s Haaretz reveals all — from the Israeli side, at least — about how the Israeli blockade against Gaza operates, and although there is still a lot more to be revealed. The title of the article is: The Gaza Bonanza.

Indeed.

This Haaretz article, co-bylined by Yotam Feldman and Uri Blau, is not perfect, but we are all after all only human, and each of us does what he/she can. It was published on Thursday, and can be read in full here.

This article has appeared just now, as part of the media build-up to the second anniversary of the Hamas rout of Fatah security forces in Gaza in June 2007 — a “military coup”, fumed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), before making his own political coup by dismissing the “National Unity Government” that had been installed just a couple of months earlier, after Saudi intervention to mediate between the Palestinian “factions” in Mecca.

This “military coup” changed everything — and it is still playing out. Among other things, it made it possible for Israel and the Quartet and the major international donor community to divide the Palestinians into the “Good Guys” in Ramallah, against whom all sanctions were suddenly removed and with whom everybody began to do big business, and the “Bad Guys” in Gaza, where Hamas retained some kind of control. Then, the screws were turned, and Israeli sanctions that had been in place against Gaza before were gradually intensified — to the point that Gazans literally survive because of smuggling.

[And, by the way, it is interesting to note that Hamas argued that they carried out their “military coup” in effect as a measure of self-defense. They believed they were preventing an equally if not more bloody attack on them by the Fatah Preventive Security Forces. This view is not so far-fetched — it was sustained by an important article (The Gaza Bombshell, by David Rose) published here in April 2008 issue of the American magazine Vanity Fair, which we have previously written about here and elsewhere.]

“It is obvious that two years into the blockade, the restrictions on civilian goods entering Gaza are only hurting 1.5 million civilians, but providing no solution to regional problems”, the Executive Director of the Israeli human rights organization GISHA, Sari Bashi, commented in a phone interview on Friday. “Almost nothing is allowed into Gaza … and there is no security rationale for that … This is not serving Israel’s security interests. Two years since the closure, none of the declared security or political goals have been achieved”.

Continue reading UNRWA official dines with IDF's Amos Gilad while blockaded Gazans get … whatever Gilad allows: "Let them eat cake!"

Richard Goldstone due in region this weekend to begin hearings on Gaza war

Until the last minute, it was not clear how South Africa’s Justice Richard Goldstone would arrive in the region this weekend with a mandate from the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva to begin an inquiry into the IDF’s Operation Cast Lead against Gaza (27 December – 18 January), or whetherIsrael will or will not let him enter the country, if he tries to come here.

Israel — which often prefers ambiguity — apparently did not reply to Goldstone’s request for a visa.

The mission’s mandate is to “investigate all violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law that might have been committed at any time in the context of the military operations that were conducted in Gaza during the period from 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009, whether before, during or after.”

Continue reading Richard Goldstone due in region this weekend to begin hearings on Gaza war

Medical care for Palestinian patients in chaos

At some point in January, during or just after the IDF Operation Cast Lead against Gaza, the Palestinian Authority decided to stop referring Palestinian patients to Israeli hospitals, and to stop paying for their treatment in Israeli hospitals.

As a result, Israeli hospitals stopped treating Palestinian patients.

This affected, as Israeli human rights organizations reported today, “coverage for chronically ill Palestinian patients, and those in need of complex care that is not available in other tertiary medical centers in the region. The result has been that an estimation of hundreds of Palestinian patients who were in the middle of long-term treatment regimes in Israel, including cancer patients in need of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and bone marrow transplantation, found their treatments interrupted with no alternatives”.
Continue reading Medical care for Palestinian patients in chaos

International Women's Day, Part Two

For Valentine’s Day, and at the special request of the Dutch government, you may recall, and as we wrote here earlier, the Israeli Military’s Coordinator of [Israeli, of course] Government Activities in the Territories (known as COGAT — and yes, this is part of the Ministry of Defense) allowed 25,000 carnations to leave the Gaza Strip and even went so far as to allow them to arrive in Europe in time for the romantic holiday.

Later reports indicated that even double that amount — some 55,000 carnations, actually — reportedly made it to the European markets just in time for Valentine’s Day.

That was the first export allowed out of Gaza in over a year.

Gaza’s economy was previously based on export of produce (and, when allowed, of human day-labor).

Now, COGAT has reported, “135,000 carnations were exported this week from Gaza to the European market at the request of the Dutch government”. This must have been for International Women’s Day, of course! (This has not gotten the same little surge of coverage that the Valentine’s Day carnations received — is this boring already?)

GISHA, the Israeli human rights organization that has passionately persisted in challenging in Israel’s Supreme Court as collective punishment, illegal collective punishment — and as immoral folly — the Israeli Military closure and the Military-administered sanctions imposed on the Gaza Strip to punish Hamas, has now produced a short animated spot trying to illustrate aspects of the closure and sanctions.

Closed Zone - animation for GISHA
Continue reading International Women's Day, Part Two

High UN Offical calls on Israel to open Gaza borders – Israeli human rights group says Israel is deliberately obstructing repairs to Gaza's electricity

Here are two more items — actually, three — which deserve attention and reflection:

I. More excerpts from a Statement to the United Nations Security Council in New York by John Holmes, UN Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, 27 January 2009:
“There are important principles at stake here too, as the Security Council itself clearly recognized in Resolution 1860, which paid particular attention to the unimpeded provision and distribution of humanitarian assistance. Free and full access for goods and humanitarian staff is something we have battled long and hard for in other contexts, such as Darfur and Myanmar … Moreover, Israel has a particular responsibility as the occupying power in this context, because of its control of Gaza ’s borders, to respect the relevant provisions of international humanitarian law. It is therefore critical that new steps are taken immediately by the Israeli authorities to move quickly to the sustained re-opening of crossing points on the basis of the 2005 Agreement on Movement and Access. Many countries support this. The crossings need to be opened up not because Hamas want it or might benefit from it, but because the Gazans need it“…
Continue reading High UN Offical calls on Israel to open Gaza borders – Israeli human rights group says Israel is deliberately obstructing repairs to Gaza's electricity

Gazan students may be able to exit for study after all

The Israeli human rights organization Gisha reported late on Sunday that “The U.S. Consulate tonight told Fulbright candidates from Gaza that it is restoring funding for the prestigious scholarship program and is ‘working closely’ with the government of Israel to secure permits for the students to leave Gaza in order to attend visa interviews at the U.S. Consulate in Jerusalem and thereafter to leave Gaza for travel to the United States”.

An article published in the New York Times on Thursday apparently brought the matter straight to the attention of the relevant authorities.

Then, it apparently took the intervention of U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice to bring about what looks like a reversal.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is due to travel to Washington on Monday for meetings with U.S. Administration officials, including Secretary Rice, Gisha noted..
A U.S. State Department deputy spokesman, Tom Casey, told journalists during a prolonged exchange in Friday’s press briefing that “Certainly, I can tell you that we have been actively speaking to Israeli officials here in Washington as well as in Israel itself about this issue today, and certainly have expressed our concerns about this issue, talked about the importance that we place on it, noted the Secretary’s personal concern about this issue. And we are working to resolve it and certainly believe that we can come to a positive outcome on this with the Israelis … I think the discussions that people have had with the Israelis have indicated that, first and foremost, they heard our concerns about this, that they understand that this is a very important program to us, that it is something that the Secretary has personally asked to be looked into, and something that they had said – they had said in response that they would like to be able to work with us on and would like to be able to resolve. So I think we take their – these conversations as a positive sign that we ultimately will be able to come to an agreeable and positive outcome here”.
It is not clear whether this would affect all eight of the original candidates for the award.
Casey said that “We have eight grants available for Gaza and we initially nominated eight individuals. One of those individuals has subsequently dropped out, so we are currently talking about seven”.

Earlier on Friday, there had been some suggestion that the Fulbright fellowship money that could not be used by Palestinians students from Gaza might instead be re-directed to Palestinian students from the West Bank.

The New York Times article, written from Gaza by Jerusalem bureau chief Ethan Bronner, said that “Israel has isolated this coastal strip, which is run by the militant group Hamas. Given that policy, the United States Consulate in Jerusalem said the grant money had been ‘redirected’ to students elsewhere out of concern that it would go to waste if the Palestinian students were forced to remain in Gaza.”

But, during the course of the day on Friday, that seem to change. Casey said in Friday’s briefing that “while there had been steps taken to technically reprogram some of those funds if we were not able to get exit visas for this group, as far as I know, there have not been other nominees selected or awards made at this point”.

He added that “certainly, we want to do everything we can. The fact that we have a Fulbright program that includes individuals from Gaza is just one small example of our
efforts to ensure that, even despite the takeover, the illegal takeover of Gaza by Hamas and Hamas’ continued misrule of Gaza, that we do intend to continue to reach out and work with the people in the Gaza Strip. And certainly, again, the fact that we have this program, that we’re continuing it, and that we are very much interested in providing these kinds of opportunities for qualified Palestinians is a sign that, contrary to the idea that we’ve somehow looked away from Gaza or neglected it, that we very much are engaged and involved, even despite the fact of, you know, Hamas’ continued takeover or continued control of the area”.
The Jerusalem Post reported on Sunday that “Officials in the Prime Minister’s Office Saturday night expressed ‘surprise’ at State Department criticism of Israel for reportedly not letting seven Gazan students leave the Gaza Strip on Fulbright scholarships, saying that the State Department did not directly contact the PMO about the issue. According to the officials, there is an individual in the PMO whose job it is to facilitate the passage for humanitarian needs of certain individuals from the Gaza Strip … ‘In the past, many countries have approached us, and we have made it possible to facilitate study abroad. In this case they just did not approach us, and assumed it would be impossible’.” The Jerusalem Post added that Israeli officials said on Saturday night that these students “would be allowed to leave for their studies”.
Earlier in the week, the Knesset Education Committee met to discuss a report from Gisha on the difficulties facing students wanting to leave Gaza to pursue their education – and no student has been given permission to leave Gaza since January, Gisha said.
According to Gisha, Education Committee Chairman Michael Melchior said that “ preventing students in Gaza from studying is reminiscent of a painful point in Jewish history. We are a nation that for years was prevented from studying – how can we do the same thing to another people? … Trapping hundreds of students in Gaza is immoral and unwise”.
The Jerusalem Post added that “Melchior also argued that the policy contravened international conventions and the values of the Jewish state”.
At the Education Committee meeting, Gisha later recounted, military officials present said that “exit from Gaza is permitted ‘for exceptional humanitarian and urgent medical cases only’.”
The New York Times article said that “a Defense Ministry official recalled that the cabinet had declared Gaza ‘hostile territory’ and decided that the safety of Israeli soldiers and civilians at or near the border should be risked only to facilitate the movement out of Gaza for humanitarian concerns, like medical treatment. Higher education, he said, was not a humanitarian concern”.
Now, Sari Bashi, executive director of GISHA, said in a press release issued on Sunday night, “According to an e-mail sent Sunday night to Fulbright students by the U.S. Consulate, the Department of State is ‘working to secure exit permits for you to travel to Jerusalem for your visa interview and for final travel to the United States in order to participate in the Fulbright Program this year. We are working closely with the Government of Israel in order to secure its cooperation in this matter’. The e-mail said the scholarship finalization process would now resume”.

At 9 am on Monday morning, Gisha reports, Israel’s Supreme Court will start to hear petitions that Gisha will argue on behalf of two other Gazan students who want to reach their studies, respectively, in the U.K. and in Germany.