Fatah's 45th Anniversary

Ramallah – and large parts of the West Bank, it is safe to say — have been having an orgy of Fatah-anniversary events this weekend.

Palestinian television this evening had a wonderful Fatah-45th-anniversary musical event starting at 7pm that was broadcast live from the Qasr Thaqafi (Cultural Palace) in Ramallah. The singers and musicians were first rate — why don’t we hear more from these people? Why aren’t their songs playing on every radio station? In every hotel and restaurant?

[UPDATE: Some of the performers were: Omar Hassan, Ra’ed Kabbaha, Dalal Abu Ammeh, Ahmad al-Jamaawi, and Basim or Basil Said…]

One singer [I did not catch his name well, — I think it was Abbas Abu Nisri (sp?), and I think the announcers said he was from Kuwait] had a rousing, throbbing song, starting off about (East) Jerusalem (al-Quds), which included the refrain: “Al-insaniyya ahla hurriyeh” (roughly, “The humanitarian is the best (most beautiful) freedom”) which brought the audience to its feet.

There was a comedic monologue by one of the actors on Palestinian televisions hit comedy show, “Watan 3ala Watar” (“Homeland on a Shoestring”) which premiered in Ramadan. In the performance at tonight’s Fatah festival, the actor’s most appreciated remarks were directed at independent Palestinian politician Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi, and his Mubadara political party. The actor’s jabs at Hamas appeared to fall a bit flat…

[Meanwhile, what was happening in East Jerusalem itself? See this account, on Mondoweiss here, of the very miserable and deteriorating situation, accompanied by photographs… And, Mondoweiss also reports on the weekly Friday demonstration yesterday in Bil’in, here, illustrated by a news photographer, wearing a gas mask, carrying out his journalistic and reporting functions in a cloud of Israeli-fired tear gas.]

Later, after the news, Palestinian television rebroadcast another Fatah-45th-Anniversary political rally (Palestinian television said it was in “occupied [East] Jerusalem” possibly in Abu Dis) addressed by Ahmad Qurei’a (Abu Alaa’), by Tawfik Tirawi, and earlier by another staccato political orator. These speeches were followed by a beautiful quiet musical performance by a lovely and serious young women in a black pants suit with long dark hair and wire-rim glasses (without the ususal heavy makeup) who played the ‘oud accompanied by a couple of other musicians. She sang in the most beautiful voice that dominated the performance. The audience at the rally wasn’t paying too much attention — after all the speech-making, they were relieved to have a break to mix and mingle and greet each other. When Adnan Husseini, Governor of Jerusalem, stood up to leave (greeted intermittently by well-wishers), Palestinian television faded away in the middle of the young woman’s song. But she was very, very good — great — and more should be heard from her.

Fatah has the best singers — that’s for sure.

During the news, Palestinian television showed the Fatah-45h-anniversary event in Libya — that there there were some pretty good girl dancers (folkloric).

Palestinian television — which is supposed to be the “national” television — which has focused on the doings of the leadership, seems to have become Fatah television (the official Fatah satellite TV channel that was launched last May, and which was headed by the more-or-less ousted Nabil Amr, has now gone off the air at the end of December — and the new Fatah media chief, Mohammad Dahlan, is preparing to launch a new satellite TV channel…)

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) was not there – travelling again on important diplomatic missions. His representative at the Ramallah event, according to Palestinian television, was Tayib Abdur Rahman. But Salam Fayyad (and Madame) shared the center front row spot with the Palestinian Authority’s Mr. Culture, Yasser Abed Rabbo (he was Minister of Culture at the time he persuaded the Japanese Government to pay for constructing the Cultural Palace) and his wife, the novelist and filmmaker Liana Badr. Azzam al-Ahmad and Saeb Erekat were near the center of the front row, as was Jibril Rajoub. Not far away was Mohammad Dahlan. As the audience clapped in time with some of the musical tunes, it became clear that these politicians were not at all good clappers — they had no rhythm, no sense of timing. They certainly did not clap all together. They were, quite simply, clapping-impaired. Of the front-row group, Sa’eb Erekat was the best and most enthusiastic clapper, and Dahlan was by far the worst.

The Fatah festival was kicked off on Thursday evening at 6pm with a televised address given by the leader, President Abbas, at the Palestinian Presidential Headquarters, or Muqata’a, in Ramallah. In that speech, Abbas again defended his actions during the crisis that began in early October when he initially agreed to postpone discussion, in the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, of the Goldstone report concerning last winter’s war in Gaza. And, in Thursday’s speech, Abbas again made his incomprehensible “Muhammad Goldstone” joke… He also criticized Hamas.

For those who missed the speech, Abbas’ new crowd of media advisers have booked him for one interview after another in recent weeks, which are ususally replayed at full length at least twice, if not more. Last night, Abbas was interviewed on Palestinian television, for almost two hours, and in that interview Abbas repeated the main points from his speech.

Abbas was elected Fatah party leader by acclamation last August in Bethlehem, live on television during what were until that sudden and unannounced (except to the TV cameramen) moment during strictly-closed proceedings, at the Fatah General Conference (the first in two decades).

Meanwhile, in Gaza, as Ma’an News Agency reported, “The facto Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh congratulated the Fatah movement on the occasion of its 45th anniversary, asking those he called ‘rational’ within the movement to complete the process of national reconciliation…Haniyeh, however, speaking in front of the destroyed buildings of the Palestinian Legislative Council, noted his willingness to sign the Egyptian reconciliation deal after some amendments to the draft plan that Fatah signed on in October. This agreement, he said, should be based on true political will, rather than a written document, to achieve reconciliation between the two bitter rivals without external influence”. This report can be read in full here.

Haaretz publishes map of Olmert's offer to Abu Mazen

Here is the graphic of the map, as Haaretz reconstructed it, of the “unprecedented” offer made during direct contacts in 2008 between Israel’s then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen ):

Olmert peace plan presented to Abu Mazen as reconstructed by Haaretz - 17 Dec 09

The accompanying article, published in Haaretz today, was written by Aluf Benn, who reported that “Former prime minister Ehud Olmert proposed giving the Palestinians land from communities bordering the Gaza Strip and from the Judean Desert nature reserve in exchange for Jewish settlement blocs in the West Bank.   According to the map proposed by Olmert, which is being made public here for the first time, the future border between Israel and the Gaza Strip would be adjacent to kibbutzim and moshavim such as Be’eri, Kissufim and Nir Oz, whose fields would be given to the Palestinians. Olmert also proposed giving land to a future Palestinian state in the Beit She’an Valley near Kibbutz Tirat Tzvi; in the Judean Hills near Nataf and Mevo Betar; and in the area of Lachish and of the Yatir Forest. Together, the areas would have involved the transfer of 327 square kilometers of territory from within the Green Line.  Olmert presented his map to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in September of last year. Abbas did not respond, and negotiations ended. In an interview with Haaretz on Tuesday, Abbas said Olmert had presented several drafts of his map. The version being disclosed Thursday in Haaretz is based on sources who received detailed information about Olmert’s proposals. Olmert wanted to annex 6.3 percent of the West Bank to Israel, areas that are home to 75 percent of the Jewish population of the territories … Olmert proposed the transfer of territory to the Palestinians equivalent to 5.8 percent of the area of the West Bank as well as a safe-passage route from Hebron to the Gaza Strip via a highway that would remain part of the sovereign territory of Israel but where there would be no Israeli presence.  Olmert gave Col. (res.) Danny Tirza, who had been the primary official involved in planning the route of the security fence, the task of developing the map that would provide the permanent border between Israel and the Palestinian state. Olmert’s proposed annexation to Israel of settlement blocs corresponds in large part to the route of the security fence. In his proposal for a territory swap, Olmert rejected suggestions previously raised involving the transfer to the Palestinians of the eastern Lachish hills, deciding instead to establish communities there for evacuees from the Gaza Strip. He also showed a preference for giving the Palestinians agricultural land over the transfer of the Halutza sands near the Egyptian border. The implementation of the Olmert plan would require the evacuation of tens of thousands of settlers and the removal of hallmarks of the West Bank settlement enterprise such as Ofra, Beit El, Elon Moreh and Kiryat Arba, as well as the Jewish community in Hebron itself.   Olmert reached a verbal understanding with the Bush administration to the effect that Israel would receive American financial aid to develop the Negev and Galilee to absorb some of those settlers evacuated from the West Bank. Other evacuees would have been resettled in new apartments to be built in the settlement blocs that Israel would annex. Olmert’s office said in response to the disclosure of the plan: ‘On September 16, 2008, [Olmert] presented Palestinian Authority President Abu Mazen [Mahmoud Abbas] a map that had been prepared based upon dozens of conversations that the two held in the course of the intensive negotiations after the Annapolis summit. The map that was presented was designed to solve the problem of the borders between Israel and the future Palestinian state. Giving Abu Mazen the map was conditioned upon signing a comprehensive and final agreement with the Palestinians so it would not be used as an ‘opening position’ in future negotiations the Palestinians sought to conduct. Ultimately, when Abu Mazen did not give his consent to a final and complete agreement, the map was not given to him’.  Olmert’s office also told Haaretz that ‘naturally for reasons of national responsibility, we cannot relate to the content of that map and the details of the proposal. At the same time, it should be stressed that in the details contained in your question, there are a not inconsiderable number of inaccuracies that are not consistent with the map that was ultimately presented’.”   This article is posted on the Haaretz website here.

This is fascinating. The leaks are coming fast and furious. This is positioning, or pre-positioning, in advance of some bigger move.

Now, Haaretz, we would like to see a close-up map of the Olmert proposals concerning the Jerusalem area, please…

If this map is correct, Olmert was not proposing any swaps in the Jerusalem area — but sources, and other published reports, indicated that Olmert had put on the table something about Jerusalem areas with large Palestinian populations being turned over to the PA…

According to this map, the entire Greater Jerusalem Municipal area plus something around Dahiet al-Bariid (Jerusalem side) and Neve Yaakov, as well as the E-1 envelope and all of Maale Adumim — a huge amount of territory — would be “annexed to Israel”.

Also, the map does not show any Israeli ambitions in the Jordan valley, in the Israeli settlements around Jericho, or along a large part of the Dead Sea coastline, something that also seems to fly in the face of known facts [though the U.S. has apparently consistently opposed Israeli annexation — or anything like it — of the Jordan valley] …  As Ma’an News Agency reported on Friday evening, Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad told the Climate Conference in Copenhagen that ““Today, 9000 Israeli settlers living in the Jordan Valley consume approximately one quarter of the total amount of water made available to all 2.5 million Palestinians living in the West Bank.”   There are now more Israeli settlers living in the Jordan Valley than were living in Gaza at the time of former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s unilateral “Disengagement” of Israeli settlers and the soldiers protecting them in 2005.

One of the many comments posted on this article and map, on the Haaretz website (written by Johnboy in Sydney) notes the following:
…look at some of the other nonsense going on nearer the Green Line:
1) Qalqilyah is sandwiched between Tzofim and Alfei Menashe; Abbas would have no choice but to tell the Israelis that they can`t have both.
2) The twin roads leading back from Ariel through Elkana and Beit Aryeh entrap a triangle of Palestinian territory; Abbas can`t possibly accept that.
3) What on earth is that road heading south of Beit Aryeh doing/going?
4) The Latrun salient is all Israeli; is that counted in the “5%” that Israel is annexing from the Pals, or is it excluded from the calculations?
5) There is a little cut-off triangle of land betweem Givat Ze`ev and Nataf; were we supposed to miss that fact?”

Mitchell was here

Like graffitti on a wall.

U.S. Special Envoy George Mitchell said, after meeting Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) in the Palestinian Presidential headquarters (the Muqata’a) in Ramallah on Friday — during an otherwise complete strike in support of Palestinian East Jerusalem called by the largest Palestinian political party (Fatah) which happens to be headed by Abu Mazen — that he has invited the Palestinian and Israeli sides to send representatives for indirect talks in Washington next week.

Mitchell said: “We invited the two sides to send their representatives to Washington in the very near future to continue our discussions”.

Then, Mitchell flew off to Cairo.

After Mitchell touched down in “the region” on Thursday night, an unnamed “senior U.S. official” told journalists in Israel that “President Barack Obama had instructed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Mitchell to report to him by mid-October on progress“. Has Obama said, in other words, don’t bother me until something (positive, progress) happens? Meantime, will he just follow the situation in the newspapers, or on TV?

Continue reading Mitchell was here